thoth_at_purplefrog.com writes:
 > 
 >   Don't let my whining get you down.
 > 
 > <braam_at_cs.cmu.edu> ,in message <199806031311.JAA01380_at_carissimi.coda.cs.cmu.edu
 > 	>, wrote: 
 > 
 > > 
 > > Hello Allan,
 > > 
 > > Coda is reasonably stable.
 > 
 >   But is not supported on non-experimental kernels, and hasn't been optimized
 > for weakly connected servers.

It runs on 2.0 kernels although some kernel Code improvements here
would be welcome.

 > 
 >   I don't have time to experiment with the latest kernels and download all the
 > modified utilities that are required.

But Allan maybe does.  Clearly is not a canned product yet -- compare
it to Linux 0.99 and join the _development_ effort -- that's what I'm
advocating. 

 > 
 >   Also, my potential application involves servers connected through an IPSEC
 > tunnel over an ISDN line and the big bad internet.
 > 

Are you taking care of adapting Coda for this, or shall we add it to
the project list? 

- Peter -

 > -- 
 > Bob Forsman                                   thoth_at_gainesville.fl.us
 >            http://www.gainesville.fl.us/~thoth/