>We had a discussion about this here yesterday. Phil, why don't you go for
>the native Solaris C library and the native compiler.  Take it step by
>step: lwp, rpc2, rvm etc. and lets review what it looks like after each
>step.

I don't think that using gcc and gnu make would be bad.  It does look
like lib-src/mlwp/process.s requires gas.  I'll continue to look into
what it will take.

-- 
Phil Nelson                    NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org
e-mail: phil@cs.wwu.edu        Coda: http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu
http://www.cs.wwu.edu/~phil