How stable are the current Windows clients (both NT and 9x)?  The servers
are currently WinNT machines (though I hope to switch to Linux, and Coda is
one of the steps involved), and the clients are 9x and 2000 machines.
Sluggishness isn't a problem, since there are only a few users (me and two
other employees).  Also, if it crashes a bit, that's fine, as long as no
data is lost.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laszlo Vecsey" <master_at_internexus.net>
To: <codalist_at_TELEMANN.coda.cs.cmu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: Production environment?


> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Chris Snyder wrote:
>
> > Is anyone currently using Coda in a production environment?  I am
planning a
> > web server cluster, and do not want to spend 1000's of dollars on a
shared
> > RAID system if I don't have to.
>
> I would recommend trying coda for the web environment as you describe, but
> then perhaps putting a squid proxy, even multiple ones, in the network so
> the requests get cached and go there first. Also, use samba to export the
> filesystems to the windows clients until the coda client for windows is
> running better -- any comments on this? The windows coda client just seems
> kind of sluggish to me.
>
> > The Coda system would also be used in place
> > of Windows file sharing for all of the client machines.
> >
>