You can try to use gcc 2.95.2 instead of 2.96 installed on RedHat 7.x.
gcc 2.96 is beta.

Good luck
---
Cordiali saluti / Best regards
Andrea Cerrito
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A.
P.zzale Bosco 3A
05100 Terni IT
Tel. +39 744 5441330
Fax. +39 744 5441372

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: GiantWEB [mailto:matty_at_giantweb.com]
> Inviato: lunedi 21 maggio 2001 23.49
> A: Jan Harkes
> Cc: codalist_at_coda.cs.cmu.edu
> Oggetto: RE: 5.3.14 compile problem
> 
> 
> Do U suggest using redhat 6.2 for now?
> 
> I need a stable version to test..
> 
> Thanks,
> -Matt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Harkes [mailto:jaharkes_at_cs.cmu.edu]
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:44 PM
> To: Ajay S. Kang
> Cc: 
> Subject: Re: 5.3.14 compile problem
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 05:25:18PM -0400, Ajay?S. Kang wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I downloaded coda 5.3.14, lwp 1.7, rpc2 1.11 and rvm 1.4 and was able
> > to configure and make lwp,rpc2 and rvm sucessfully. The configure
> > script for coda also ran without errors. However when I ran make I
> > got the following:
> 
> RedHat 7.1, I know.
> 
> I've already got a bunch of these fixed up, tried compiling using a
> gcc-3.0 beta release. However I'm stuck at some very broken looking
> varargs parsing code in venus/vol_cml.cc.
> 
> > another error. Since I didn't see any queries on the mailing list
> > about this I suspect the error is not something as simple as a few
> > missing #includes... Am I missing something in the make process?
> 
> No, you are just using a bleeding edge version of the gcc which is a lot
> stricter about using functions without prototypes etc. Hopefully the
> next Coda release will pass through the compiler correctly. You can also
> grab a copy from our CVS tree and see how far that one gets you.
> 
> Jan
> 
>