Coda File System

Re: Amanda differences: 2.4.4p1 (installed) vs. 2.4.4-2 (compiled)

From: Jason A. Pattie <pattieja_at_pcxperience.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:49:40 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jason A. Pattie wrote:
| Anybody know the differences between the latest version of Amanda that
| is being distributed (i.e., 2.4.4p1-2) and the version that comes from
| CVS on coda's site (i.e., 2.4.4-2)?  In other words, is it going to
| break my current installation if I go ahead and apt-get update to the
| Amanda packages I've dpkg-buildpackage'd from coda's CVS?
|
| I know one difference is the special wrappers that interpret the CODA
| backup system properly and feed the data to Amanda properly.  But are
| there any other significant differences, or should it just be a drop-in
| replacement?

I setup the /etc/amanda/daily/amanda.conf|disklist files according to
previous configuration examples from this list.  When I issued an
'amcheck daily -c' as the backup user on Debian on the file server, it
reported multiple errors, one each for every volume I'm attempting to
backup.  Are these harmless errors? or will the backup not succeed?

- --
Jason A. Pattie
pattieja_at_xperienceinc.com
Xperience, Inc. (http://www.xperienceinc.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAO/EkuYsUrHkpYtARApFNAJ4st4dBsR+bWxkQUe3GsfqLrsy0wQCfR/H2
1QR4TwZbwqtUX22kRs/wpPk=
=AACS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
Received on 2004-02-24 19:51:14