Coda File System

Re: Amanda differences: 2.4.4p1 (installed) vs. 2.4.4-2 (compiled)

From: Jason A. Pattie <pattieja_at_pcxperience.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:12:50 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jan Harkes wrote:
| Actually, just checked the logs of last night's backups and it turned
| out that the actual sendbackup failed. The code tried to add
| /usr/local/bin/team to the dump pipeline, which ofcourse doesn't exist
| on most systems. We needed that to make backups more reliable from a
| couple of our servers which have large, non-compressible volumes.
|
| I ifdef'd out the team related code and bumped the version to
|     amanda-2.4.4p2-1.coda2

Amazingly the backup succeeded last night.  But the amverify for the
coda volumes failed.  The error message included:

Using device /dev/nst0
Volume Daily204, Date 20040225
Skipped <coda file server name>.coda.root.20040225.0 (** Cannot do
/usr/sbin/volutil dumps)
.
.
.
Skipped <coda file server name>.internal.private.20040225.0 (** Cannot
do /usr/sbin/volutil dumps)
End-of-Tape detected.


When I ran '/usr/sbin/volutil dumps' as the 'backup' user, I got the
usage information for volutil.  In it I saw the command 'dump' but not
'dumps'.  I did a cursory grep through the amanda sources, but couldn't
come up with a location in the code that volutil is called with dumps.

Is this an error that can safely be ignored? or is there even a way to
verify the dumps that are made to tape?

- --
Jason A. Pattie
pattieja_at_xperienceinc.com
Xperience, Inc. (http://www.xperienceinc.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAPikSuYsUrHkpYtARAtILAJ4itsQNet5gvXImlVON9TBOOtkGMwCfbw9Z
Kdxx4PudboYnOeUDT+shgjU=
=Sz60
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
Received on 2004-02-26 12:14:49